Two weeks have passed since I came down off the mountain, and to my disappointment two weeks is apparently more than enough time for the influences of fresh country air, lots of meditation and (surprisingly) good vegan food to wear off, and for reality to sink back in.
The reality, which settles over the spaces of my existence un-occupied by work and sleep, is one which seems to suitably complement the gloom of the Glasgow winter I have returned to. It is a reality in which many of my friends are without a job – and quite a few are – for all intents and purposes – homeless as a result: it is a reality in which most of the people – asylum seekers and refugees – I work with, survive on near to nothing (if not nothing) daily, weekly, eternally; it is a reality in which anti-detention and deportation campaigners must work harder than ever before to keep up with the UKBA: it is a reality in which the Palestinian friends I stay in constant touch with (for who can deny the relevance of facebook in any discussion of reality?!) give me news of exams, frustration and arbitrary arrest: it is a reality in which Twitter tells of Tahrir and tear gas all over again; it is a reality in which I cannot find a deodorant brand that is does not use animal testing.
And as this social reality sinks back in, so to does my own internal reality: a reality of continuous, un-wavering outrage – sometimes furious sometimes smouldering – but always present. It is the same outrage I felt almost a decade ago, when, as a 15 year old girl, I watched the UK march against the Iraq War to no avail. It is the same outrage I felt, as I stood on the edge of a First Nations reserve and took in the stark inequality between the Indigenous population of Turtle Island, and their conquerors. It is the same outrage that I felt as I watched Israel shower phosphorous on the open air prison that is Gaza: the same outrage I felt as I stood in the face of teargas and sound-bombs alongside the courageousness of a tiny occupied village in rural Palestine: it is the same outrage that I felt when I heard that yet another young Afghan man had been deported; it is the same outrage I felt when I came to understand the meaning of ‘dawn-raids’: t is the same outrage I felt when the news of Donald Trump’s victory (and Aberdeenshire Councils cowardice) signalled the inevitable destruction a site of incredible natural beauty: It is the same outrage that I felt when I realized the true meaning of destitution – no roof, no food, no nothing. I could go on and on (you probably think I already did).
That outrage – first articulated with the whistles and chants I learned as a 15-year-old on a packed-out high-street in Aberdeen – has changed little in its fundamental principles: in its desire for dignity and humanity, in it’s aversion to injustice and exploitation. Yet whilst its inherent qualities remain, its strength seems still to grow, like a tiger I had taken for a house cat. Despite the supposedly-exhaustive nature of my own internal resources, I do not feel less outraged (though I have learned that throwing crockery is an un-helpful and relatively expensive outlet). As everyday my eyes open wider, so too my outrage seems to grow.
At times this outrage is an isolating beast – when you have a tiger not many people want to come round for tea. Yet if one were to pay a moments attention to the world outside, to the streets, to the media, to facebook – one could see that the tiger has become a rather common pet. As John Holloway rightly articulated it this has been a “year of rage”. Solid and certain, ferocious and magnificent – that rage is growing in hundreds of millions across the globe: from the Arab spring, to the 99% movement, to the never-ending struggles in Latin America, to the shores and cities of Scotland. And with it – with our tigers by our sides – millions strong now – we are beginning to feel invincible. As the streets fill up, and the alternative messages – calls for humanity above greed, for the 99% – start reaching us, it becomes thinkable that dictators can be toppled, it becomes imaginable that wall-streets grip could at the very least be loosened, that the environment can be prioritized: change, finally, is becoming tangible.
Yet we must be careful not to confuse these manifestations of collective emotion expressed not inwardly now (not by shouting at the television, not by drinking too much whiskey, not by lashing out at those beside us) but outwardly on the streets, in the parks, in the symbolic locations of oppressive power as the means for change in and of themselves. We must hope cautiously, act bravely and be prepared for the long haul. As my Egyptian friend adamantly pointed out, two weeks after the revolution “we have completed the easiest step: we still have a very long way to go”. He cited decades: 6 months later and Tahrir is packed out once again.
Whether the present rage and its associated actions, will fuel tangible change or merely contribute to our own slow and costly un-doing (through burn-out, internal conflict, manipulation) remains far from clear at this point. It is not unknown for tigers to turn upon their owners – rage is no less an unpredictable beast. Furthermore, despite the tigers natural power, it is still not top of the food chain: no matter how the tiger roars, no matter how much power she has within her jaws, no matter how well she knows the jungle, the armed-man still has the upper-hand (or arm…).
We only have to look to Syria, Bahrain, Yemen, to recognise that brutality is not in any danger of running out. Even in the struggles which we had claimed as victories the story is not yet completed: the images that reach us via Al-Jazeera and Facebook from the Arab Spring are permeated with the eternal juxtaposition of mourning and celebration. In Egypt the jubilation which followed Mubarak’s fall only months ago, has been overcome once again by the need to protest as the military responsible for the transition attempts to retain extra powers in the coming elections. Anti-cuts protests and the occupy wall-street movement have moved millions onto the streets but they have not yet had any significant influence on policy (though these are early days). Donald Trump got our beach, with only an independent film and a small ill-positioned ‘bunker’ to taint the sweet taste of victory he must be accustomed to by now. In Glasgow, the dawn raids we thought we had seen the last of in 2006 once again threaten to de-humanize our streets before the sun has reached them: this month two young mothers have been raided – they’re small children detained along with them: they are guilty of no crime.
Yet, I do not intend to sound fatalistic: I do genuinely believe that “where there is power, there is resistance.” (Foucault: 1976): that such resistance is vital and worthwhile: I believe that today that resistance is more present and visible than ever. No, do not mistake the caution I speak of for a call to retreat. Far from that it is a call for resilience. It is an urgent request that our outrage (our tigers) and our action shall not waver in adversity, shall not dwindle in the silence, shall not be overcome by the many miles we still must march.
I am not the first to make that request: for it is being voiced in Egypt, in Wall Street, in Europe, in Glasgow. Once again batons and bullets rains down and the death-toll rise’s on the Egyptians in Tahrir. Yet the protesters do not leave: the message remains clear: as Mostafa Youssef, a young Egyptian present in Tahrir declares: “What happened yesterday proves that we, the people, collectively and without leadership, have more solidarity in adversity, we will not be tamed after being fired at, injured, imprisoned, tortured, or killed. This only makes us more resolute in our purposes, and more sure of our objectives.” In the US the police forcefully cleared the ‘liberty square, only to find themselves facing an Occupy Wall Street movement which had tripled in size by the following day: ‘you cannot evict an idea who’s time has come’ they chant. Here in Glasgow, the return of government-sponsored brutality on our doorsteps as news of fresh dawn raids filters through the networks, and so once again we will make our way to the gates of the UKBA to say “not in this city”: once again we will organize, publicise, subvert and oppose until our message is heard and acted out.
Can our outrage outlive the brutality and the legitimacy of the Home Office, of Wall Street, of Military and Political tyrants, and of the many other manifestations of oppressive power? And can it continue despite the exhaustive-nature of our internal resources and the many contradictions of the human spirit? Only time will tell. But if ever there could be hope, it is now as cities across the world light up, and the status-quo begins – finally – to tremble. It seems now, more than ever that, in the words of Dylan Thomas, we “rage against the dying of the light”.

